Semua Gambar Berita Video Belanja Maps Sosial Media Files Science
Sekitar 30 hasil (1.79 detik)
Komunitas feddit.de

SafetyGoggles

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.

Komunitas aussie.zone

You need to think long term

I used to work in IT for a decent sized ISP. There was a list of banned usernames that was fun to peruse, this was in the 2000s. Good times!

Komunitas feddit.org

I may just do Mono Therapy

Like i just tried swallowing 1/4th of my Adrocur Pioll of 50mg and ive literally puked it out :c Hasnt happened with my Other Medication i take Orally like my Thyroxine Meds :( I just wanna not have my Hairline be completely reduced to ashes :c I wanna look CUte and Girly and dont have to need to get a Wig :c Im so Scared of my reeceding Hairline at 22 so i need to get a Fix asap :c Currently talking 4 Pumps a Day of Gynokadin 0,6 mg/g Gel and its been going alright but i dont think it does much sadly :c

Komunitas lemmy.blahaj.zone

Eaglesrl

18 | đŸ‡ČđŸ‡œ đŸ‡ș🇾 | She/Her Hello! I’m an 18-year-old trans girl from Mexico. I am a big fan of Linux and everything open-source in general. I am big into Rust and C as well. Video games and music are also interests of mine. Feel free to say hi!

Komunitas lemmy.world

UK Introduces Full Social Media Ban For Under 16s - Including Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook and X.

I get that many view this as government overreach, but I’m totally OK with it. If it hurts these platforms then so be it. A 10 year old has no business being on tiktok. I’ve got kids and I can police this stuff myself, to an extent, but I’ve seen many neglectful parents who just leave their kids to their own devices (figuratively and litterally). If this prevents children being prematurely exposed to these garbage platforms then I don’t personally see the issue, but I’m open to reasonable counter arguments.

Komunitas lemmy.world

Duckingold

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.

Komunitas lemmygrad.ml

GregorMcIntosh

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.

Komunitas sopuli.xyz

It's so easy!

The oil won’t be irradiated, just the area it has to go through and also the food supply for a few billion people who eat fish from the surrounding area.

Komunitas news.abolish.capital

Peru Presidential Elections: Fujimori Leads by Minimal Margin, SĂĄnchez Demands Recount

The leftist presidential candidate for the Together for Peru party, Roberto SĂĄnchez, formally proposed to his far-right opponent, Keiko Fujimori, that they jointly request a thorough review and a total recount of the votes in the second round of the presidential election from the electoral authorities. Currently, 98% of the votes have been counted, and the candidates are separated by a minimal difference in favor of Fujimori. SĂĄnchez made his proposal on Friday, June 12. He underscored that its objective is to ensure absolute transparency, legitimacy, and political stability in Peru, regardless of who ultimately emerges victorious in an election in which each sector has the support of more than nine million citizens. CERO CONTROVERSIA Ante la extrema estrechez del resultado electoral, quiero formular pĂșblicamente una invitaciĂłn a Keiko Fujimori para reunirnos a la brevedad y actuar conjuntamente en defensa de la transparencia y la confianza ciudadana. MĂĄs allĂĄ de quiĂ©n resulte finalmente
 pic.twitter.com/rrdsfWmjcP — Roberto SĂĄnchez Palomino (@RobertoSanchP) June 12, 2026 The leftist candidate pointed out that while Fujimori’s right-wing party, Popular Force, is trying to annul votes from the country’s southern regions that overwhelmingly voted for the left, Together for Peru has detected irregularities in the capital, Lima, as well as at polling stations abroad. Together for Peru formally contested the votes cast in the United States and Argentina. The leadership of Together for Peru deemed it unacceptable that the electoral authorities changed the conditions of the process halfway through election day, discarding the digital ballot record and opting for a paper-based system. This caused an unusual three-day delay in counting the foreign votes and sowed distrust and uncertainty among an electorate seeking to end a decade of marked institutional instability. Over the past 10 years, Peru has seen eight presidents ousted due to constant parliamentary dismissals driven by interest groups in the National Assembly. Peru’s Presidential Elections: Left’s Roberto SĂĄnchez Leads Against Far-Right Keiko Fujimori Given this highly polarized scenario, SĂĄnchez called on his supporters to mobilize peacefully and demanded that no restrictions be placed on the legitimate right to protest. He emphasized that the ultimate goal of his proposal is to make the voting records public for 35 million Peruvians, ensuring democratic certainty and allowing the next president to govern the country during the 2026-2031 constitutional period without objection. According to the latest update from Peru’s National Office of Electoral Processes (ONPE), Keiko Fujimori has received 50.027% (9,055,236) of the valid votes, while Roberto SĂĄnchez has recieved 49.973% (9,045,362). Until reaching 97.9% of the votes counted on June 10, SĂĄnchez had been leading by a little over 10,000 votes. However, the count started to turn in favor of Fujimori with the arrival of foreign votes. It appears that the vote abroad was overwhelmingly in favor of Fujimori, who, with 67.4% of ballots from outside Peru counted, received around 130,000 votes, compared to 80,000 for SĂĄnchez. (Telesur) with Orinoco Tribune content Translation: Orinoco Tribune OT/SC/SF From Orinoco Tribune via This RSS Feed.

Komunitas news.abolish.capital

Canada denies Ghana star entry visa as FIFA says it cannot intervene

Ghana have suffered a major setback ahead of their 2026 World Cup campaign after it was confirmed that midfielder Thomas Partey will miss their opening match against Panama in Toronto following a decision by Canadian authorities to deny him entry to the country. According to Reuters, the ruling will deprive Ghana of one of their most influential players for their first fixture of the tournament. FIFA confirmed that Partey, who is currently with the Ghana squad in the United States, will not be permitted to travel to Canada for the match against Panama. The governing body stressed that visa decisions fall solely within the jurisdiction of the Canadian government and that FIFA has no authority to intervene or overturn the decision. The organisation added that Partey will remain available for Ghana’s other group-stage matches taking place in the United States, including upcoming fixtures against England and Croatia. The issue comes at a crucial moment for Ghana, who were expected to rely heavily on Partey’s experience during the tournament. The decision has also renewed questions about the impact of immigration and visa policies on a World Cup being jointly hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico. Reuters reported that the visa refusal is linked to legal proceedings involving the player in the United Kingdom, where he is awaiting trial over criminal allegations that he has categorically denied. Featured image via Ryan Hiscott/Getty Images By Alaa Shamali From Canary via This RSS Feed.

Komunitas lemmy.ca

Palestine Action activists sentenced as terrorists

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/48654977 A British judge has sentenced four Palestine Action protesters as terrorists, handing them custodial sentences ranging from four to eight years. The unprecedented ruling came despite jurors convicting them of criminal charges not connected to terrorism during the prosecution. On Friday, the presiding judge, Justice Jeremy Johnson, added a “terrorism connection” to their offences. In a preliminary ruling in March 2025, Johnson found an “appearance” of a terrorism connection in the case, as he said the activists were attempting to influence the Israeli government by restricting their access to weapons. This information was withheld from the jury who convicted them.

Komunitas lemmy.world

UniversalFlamingo

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.

Komunitas lemmygrad.ml

Ok real talk... What are your actual personal thoughts on AI?

I find by themselves the models, especially current-gen ones, are pretty bad at editing text. They still don’t really grasp what it entails lol, because they are not aware of their limitations. And it seems that current models are trained mainly for technical (coding) tasks over anything else, so I feel it’s only going to get worse in those applications. But I’ve had some success using a test suite afterwards to confirm data integrity. Counting lines is one such method: you just compare the number of lines between the before and after and it gives you an idea of how much was cut off, but it’s basic. An LLM in agentic can set up a full test suite to really understand what changed or not statistically, and then is able to bring back stuff from the older revision to ensure integrity and that it didn’t do too much. There’s a lot of other things it can use to test the data, and you can ask it for cross-tests too: two different tests that test the same thing, but do it in two completely different ways (like calculating “x*x” and then “x^2”).

Komunitas lemy.lol

goofystench

hi :3 25 years old 💜 depression is killing me but we vibin ✌

Komunitas discuss.tchncs.de

NHS staff battling wave of food supplement disinformation

Nope, you can eat mushrooms for flavor. If you want medicine and there is an active ingredient in mushrooms, you isolate it and get a specific and regulated dosage. I assume every alternative medicine doesn’t work, until it gets proven. Then it’s just medicine. Big pharma has been villainized for too long. We have eradicated diseases, saved millions of lives with vaccines and can keep people alive through stuff that would have been a death sentence only a couple years ago. Do all meds work for everyone? Of course not. But for a significant number of people e.g. SSRIs have been a great help. For some reason everyone thinks they have insane profits. But the manufacturing is a fraction of the cost. The real cost is in the research which has a low success rate, so a working drug needs to fund the research for many failed ones. Contrary to popular belief there is actually heavy competition in the pharma industry. Most of the popular talking points have been pushed by people selling you alternative medicine. (See Alex Jones, Joe Rogan, Dr Oz. etc.)

Komunitas lemmy.world

aragon

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.

Komunitas lemmy.today

opinions on anti-psychiatry?

Reminds me of a cartoon. Yes psychiatry dehumanizes people and the problems they are going through.

Komunitas expressional.social

“India’s Hormuz Reckoning:

“India’s Hormuz Reckoning: A Foreign Policy Shift Away From the US-Israeli Axis” by M. K. Bhadrakumar in Savage Minds on Substack @[email protected] @@masto.ai @[email protected] @iran “Make no mistake, the Modi government is squarely blaming the US for the attack on ships in the Strait of Hormuz, killing seven Indian sailors. Protests have been lodged with the US chargĂ© d’affaires twice in 3 days, the second dĂ©marche being in a notably harsher tone despite the news trickling from the Persian Gulf region, Pakistan and the US that an MOU has been all but negotiated for signature, lifting the American naval blockade of Iranian ports” https://open.substack.com/pub/savageminds/p/indias-hormuz-reckoning #Press #SocialMedia #Iran #War #Trump #Israel #OperationEpsteinFury #OperationEpicMistake #RegimeChange #WarCrimes #CrimesAgainstHumanityy #Hormuz #Empire #Collapse #US #Sanctions #EconomicWarfare #Hegemony #India #Modi

Komunitas lemmy.ml

GospelofJohnny

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.

Komunitas lemmygrad.ml

France had fascistic laws on its books as late as the 1970s

(This takes 3Ÿ–7Âœ minutes to read.) [M]any French lawyers held simplistic perceptions of a complicated reality: they believed that their economic survival was at stake because the profession was overcrowded with naturalized citizens. In fact, their economic survival was at stake because the profession had cornered itself into anti-commercialistic traditions, such as bans on advertising, on forming law firms, and on pleading cases in commercial courts. These professional strictures impinged on the ability of a newly arrived critical mass of young lawyers from the lower and middles classes to earn a living, and ultimately served to reduce the bar’s purview in the greater legal field. Generational and class change were often ignored elements of the cauldron that was the interwar profession libĂ©rale. [
] In early 1935, law students joined medical students in widespread street demonstrations to pressure the government to further reduce the rights of foreign and naturalized students. Pierre PĂ©an’s biography of François Mitterrand revealed to much public surprise the participation of the [pseudo]socialist president in this street demonstration against “les mĂ©tĂšques” during his days as a law student, proving, one could argue, the wide appeal of anti-foreigner sentiment in France in the 1930s. Some of the more extremist lawyers wished that all non-French-born citizens be permanently excluded from the legal profession, a demand which was eventually satisfied by Vichy legislation in 1940, not only for lawyers but for doctors, dentists, veterinarians, pharmacists, architects, and, of course, civil servants (Rodanet, “Le Barreau et les naturalisĂ©s, une importante question d’actualitĂ©â€). [
] While Vichy represents the twentieth-century apex of exclusion in the French professions, discriminatory legislation remained on the books for several decades after the war. Although the anti-Semitic laws of Vichy were declared null and void by the 9 August 1944 ordinance of the ComitĂ© Français de la LibĂ©ration Nationale (CFLN), and the ten-year delay for naturalized citizens’ access to the law bar was reduced to five years in October 1945, the discrimination against naturalized citizens in the legal profession was entirely removed only in 1973, and in 1978 for medicine. Drafters of the postwar republic’s immigration policy and nationality law in fact reproduced many of the same exclusionary agendas that had prevailed during the late Third Republic and Vichy, and also envisioned novel ways to discriminate. For example, a CFLN draft of a “Statut des MinoritĂ©s” contained the following provisions: for the defining of a minority as someone who could not trace a direct paternal link to someone who was a French citizen on January 1, 1800; for the apposition of a “minoritĂ©â€ stamp on a person’s Ă©tat-civil; and for a 1% numerus clausus on minorities in certain professions (“Statut”). Moreover, the CFLN and the Gouvernement provisoire de la RĂ©publique Française originally planned their postwar immigration policy based on an American model, with naturalizations heavily determined by ethnic and professional criteria (“Note”; “Communication”).⁷ None of these projects were enacted, but their elaboration suggests that paradigms about “others” had seeped through the divide from Vichy to the Fourth Republic. Although public display of anti-Semitism became taboo anew for most Frenchmen after the Liberation, some doctors, lawyers, and students continued to exhibit anti-foreigner sentiment without compunction. Their hostility persisted despite the fatal consequences of their intolerance during Vichy and the pretense of purging afterward (many of the leaders of the Medical and Law Orders remained in place throughout the Fourth Republic). Shortly after 1945, professional grievances were voiced about a chronic plethora in the medical profession (Rozoy; Hermann). In the Association of Paris Interns’ first bulletin published after the war (in 1947), the question of foreigners’ access to medical internship programs appeared three times, notably in the welcome-back message from the president on the first page. While the association’s postwar rhetoric was more careful to avoid blatant xenophobia, the distinction between foreign-born and French-born remained palpable (“Bonjour chers collĂšgues,” 2–3; “AssemblĂ©e GĂ©nĂ©rale du 11 mai 1946,” 6–9; and “SĂ©ance du ComitĂ© du novembre 1946,” in Bulletin de l’Internat des HĂŽpitaux de Paris 98. fevrier 1947. See also “SĂ©ance du ComitĂ© du 6 janvier 1948,” Bulletin de l’Internat des HĂŽpitaux de Paris 100. mars 1948, 40–41). Students in the Latin Quarter lashed out against “nĂšgres” and “mĂ©tĂšques” in 1947 (“Au quartier”). And in 1960 during the worldwide “year of the refugee,” the Medical Order and the Association Nationale des Avocats successfully squashed Deputy Palewski’s bill to allow refugees the right to practice the professions in France (“Cinquante ans de lĂ©gislation” 15). These few examples demonstrate the persistence of discriminatory sentiment within the professional corps after the war, despite the demographic and economic expansion of the trente glorieuses. [
] The Medical Order addressed its Vichy past a few months later in October 1997 at an annual meeting. President of the Order Bernard Glorion issued a declaration of regret for discrimination against Jewish doctors during the Vichy period, a “symbolic request for forgiveness in the name of the medical community” extended to Jewish doctors. He also called upon French doctors “never to yield to the temptation of exclusion” in the future (Keller). But timid language, a disingenuous assertion of postwar purging, and the fact that the representatives of the medical institution did not debate, approve, or publicize their president’s initiative all served to reinforce a pattern of denial and made this a classic non-apology (Nau; H.R.), demonstrating the limits, dangers, and politicization of such performances. Conflicts were buried anew with no final sense of reconciliation. Nor were historical myths dispersed: Glorion maintained the version that Vichy was a parenthesis in French medical history. :::spoiler (Emphasis added. Click here if you have time for more.) Vichy’s honing on to persons born of foreign fathers can be viewed as the late Third Republic’s exclusionary logic pushed to greater extremes once circumstances — defeat, occupation, new rĂ©gime — permitted. But the professional turn to anti-Semitism was something entirely new. Or was it? Historian Vicki Caron argues that inherent to the interwar mobilization over competition from foreigners was a prejudice against Jewish European immigrants and refugees, in other words, most interwar xenophobic discourse was actually veiled anti-Semitism. She says, “[T]here is no doubt that [middle-class grievances against foreigners] were aimed almost exclusively at foreign Jews, since Jews, unlike the majority of other foreigners in France, were overwhelmingly middle class” (41) (Halioua, Blouses). Some French lawyers and doctors certainly were prejudiced against Jews well before Vichy, and the Jewish refugee crisis in mid-1930s Europe served to heighten French professionals’ fears about foreign invasion. Ultimately this question hinges on comparing attitudes toward Jews (whether French or foreign) and toward foreigners (whether Jewish or not).⁔ Of course these categories also overlapped: Jewish foreigners were doubly targeted by Vichy (and women Jewish foreigners triply so). The decrees of 16 July and 11 August 1941 implementing the Statut des Juifs limited Jews to 2% of the total of non-Jewish lawyers and doctors respectively. Jewish university students were subjected to a numerus clausus of 3%. Dictated by the French state, these measures provoked little to no protest from medical and legal circles. On the contrary, French doctors and lawyers played an active rĂŽle in the implementation of the quotas: they were the ones, through their Orders, to evaluate the personal, professional, and military credentials of their Jewish colleagues and to decide whom to ban from practice (Badinter; Evleth, “The Ordre des MĂ©decins,” “Vichy”; Nahum). To be included in the 2% numerus clausus, priority was accorded to Jewish doctors and lawyers who had fought for France in the World Wars; to those who had earned military honors; and to Jewish parents, wives, or children of someone who had died fighting for France. Not only did [
] doctors and lawyers not protest the anti-Semitic exclusions that struck down their Jewish colleagues — Badinter asserts, “In the archives of the Paris law bar Council, there exists not a single trace of protest, nor even of a deliberation about the anti-Semitic quotas” (92) — but they had in fact hastily seized upon the quotas as a felicitous chance to reduce competition and redefine professional identity. It is said, for instance, that sacks filled with thousands of letters from [
] doctors denouncing colleagues as Jews, foreigners, and charlatans were found at the Medical Order offices after the war and subsequently burned in an effort to rebuild the nation (Roy). Doctors and lawyers in France also utilized their specific expertise for exclusionary projects that extended beyond their professional orbits. Some doctors put their credentials behind the promotion of scientific racialist doctrines,⁶ a practice familiar to medicine since at least the late nineteenth century however marginal it remained, while others such as Alexis Carrel played significant rĂŽles in putting a scientific seal on Vichy policies of exclusion (Muel-Dreyfus; Noiriel, Les Origines; Reggiani). And many lawyers used their legal knowledge and skills in the implementation of xenophobic and collaborationist Vichy law (Lochak; Fillon; Weisberg; Juger; Le Droit). But these practices were in fact not unheard of during the Third Republic. Doctors had long used their rĂŽle as the caretakers of public health to portray foreigners as carriers of contagion. Here is an example that appeared in a 1935 journal of a major Paris medical union: “Toute l’écume des autres pays, tous les indĂ©sirables pour leurs compatriotes, se dirigent vers la France. Notre vieille race française commence Ă  ĂȘtre submergĂ©e par cet afflux de sang polluĂ© par la masse grandissante de millions d’individus trop souvent tarĂ©s physiquement et moralement” (Grimbert). In 1938, Parisian lawyer, deputy of ArdĂšche, and future head of the Commissariat gĂ©nĂ©ral aux questions juives, Xavier Vallat, along with a number of lawyer-legislators including the aforementioned Louis Sarran, Paris law professor Donnedieu de Vabres, and president of the Aix-en-Provence bar Alfred Jourdan, cosigned a tough law for expulsions of foreigners (Vigne). Just as artisans and petty bourgeois intellectuals acted as intermediaries to plant republican sentiment in French villages in the first half of the nineteenth century (Agulhon), doctors and lawyers acted as mediators to create and circulate ideas, and to shape and fix a sentiment of xenophobia in the social mind in the late Third Republic. What effect did Vichy’s exclusionary legislation have? Approximately 1,400 doctors lost their livelihood in France because of foreign parentage and another 1,600 Jewish doctors in the Seine region alone lost theirs (Nahum 179–182; Halioua, “La xĂ©nophobie et l’antisĂ©mitisme dans le milieu mĂ©dical, 111”). Some 220 Paris lawyers were eliminated from the profession because of the anti-Semitic quota (Badinter 150–159). Those few doctors and lawyers still free to practice their profession, after having endured the repugnant selection by their colleagues, still faced, as “others,” the perils of daily life in occupied France such as avoiding arrest and “aryanization,” managing the yellow star and the restrictions on movement. Some doctors and lawyers were killed as a result of Vichy discriminations. In August 1941, for example, forty-two Jewish lawyers were arrested in Paris and interned at the Drancy camp. Some of them were well-known, such as Pierre Masse who later died at Auschwitz (Badinter 128–144). (Emphasis added.) ::: Further reading: ‘Vichy France and the Continuity of Medical Nationalism’

Komunitas lemmy.world

pnelego

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.

Komunitas mander.xyz

China bonds emerge as surprise haven as Iran war reshapes portfolios

It’s not so a surprise, as what is going on has been happening for a while now with Chinese bond yields being historically low for some time now. As the Financial Times writes: Every slice of China’s bond market has now succumbed to Japanisation - (Archived) Back in November 2024, China’s 30-year bond yield fell below Japan’s for the first time in history 
 A year later, China’s 10-year yield also fell victim to Japanisation 
 That was “a historic crossover that may reignite fears the world’s No. 2 economy is sliding into the deflationary spiral that paralysed its neighbour in the 1990s” according to Bloomberg at the time 
 Then, in March, two-year yields did the same. And last week, even China’s 12-month bill yield briefly moved below Japan’s 
 There’s no secret to what is going on here. Japan’s economy has finally emerged from deflation. 
 Meanwhile, China’s economy is sluggish, Chinese real estate continues to struggle, the debt overhang is monstrous, and the country’s demographics are bad. Plus, some investors think Chinese bonds are an attractive, safe diversifier for portfolios, weighing further on yields.

Komunitas feddit.de

Khorgor666

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.

Komunitas mander.xyz

China bonds emerge as surprise haven as Iran war reshapes portfolios

It’s not so a surprise, as what is going on has been happening for a while now with Chinese bond yields being historically low for some time now. As the Financial Times writes: Every slice of China’s bond market has now succumbed to Japanisation - (Archived) Back in November 2024, China’s 30-year bond yield fell below Japan’s for the first time in history 
 A year later, China’s 10-year yield also fell victim to Japanisation 
 That was “a historic crossover that may reignite fears the world’s No. 2 economy is sliding into the deflationary spiral that paralysed its neighbour in the 1990s” according to Bloomberg at the time 
 Then, in March, two-year yields did the same. And last week, even China’s 12-month bill yield briefly moved below Japan’s 
 There’s no secret to what is going on here. Japan’s economy has finally emerged from deflation. 
 Meanwhile, China’s economy is sluggish, Chinese real estate continues to struggle, the debt overhang is monstrous, and the country’s demographics are bad. Plus, some investors think Chinese bonds are an attractive, safe diversifier for portfolios, weighing further on yields.