Should Wemby get Flagrant Foul for closeout on Brunson in game 5?
This shit is rigged, they were never going to blow the whistle against this guy.
This shit is rigged, they were never going to blow the whistle against this guy.
Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.
Because while LLMs are not quite what they are marketed, they are good or better than certain people at certain things. My impression is that it’s going to be a slow drawn out and painful fizzle rather than a pop.
Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.
I mean, the main difference with you lot is that the Brits were actually pretty good at it. Yanks on the other hand just go galloping in, fuck everything up, shit your pants, and then slowly slink back into the bushes while shouting “look, we won!” Make a few films about how sad it is that some Brave American Heroes get nightmares from all the defenceless children they shot/gassed/orphaned, realise that the Real Lesson is buying a bigger flag and forgiving yourself, rinse, and repeat. I see you’re at the “buy a bigger flag” stage.
Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.
Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.
You forgot to mention murdering everyone in their neighborhood while they’re busy defending their house.
Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.
From Paul J Marcotte The Great Horned Owls camouflage is incredible. Do you see Mama and 2 Owlets? If there eyes were not open they’d be nearly impossible to see.
Hey friends, I wanted to share Sharestream: https://codeberg.org/sharestream/sharestream It’s a lightweight FastAPI app that sits in front of Stash and turns selected videos or tag collections into clean, shareable links with first-class social previews on Lemmy, Mastodon, Discord, Bluesky, etc. — without exposing your Stash API key or making your Stash instance public. Highlights: Short, customizable URLs for individual videos and tag-based collection shares Optional per-share passwords, expirations, and resolution Rich Open Graph / Twitter-player previews with animated WebP thumbnails for clients that support them, content-negotiated static JPEGs for ones that don’t Configurable embed policy: preview clip, full video, or dynamic based on size/duration Custom Video.js skin (also used inside Mastodon-style inline embeds) that fits any video to the viewport correctly on first paint Optional limit_to_tag safety—public browsing only surfaces specifically tagged videos Optional CW / age-gate overlay for new visitors Contact / DMCA takedown form Curated public homepage Drop-in branding Admin dashboard All viewer-facing Stash media — HLS playlists/segments, MP4 previews/full streams, WebP previews, thumbnails — is served through access-checked proxy routes. Direct Stash media URLs cannot leak, and full videos are never stored locally. I’ve refactored the codebase to pave the way for Jellyfin and potentially other backend support, but for now it’s Stash-only. I’m running a demo instance using stock footage from Pond5: https://share.lemmy.porn/ (100% SFW; <100% uptime). Password-protected tag collection example: https://share.lemmy.porn/HIMjx5Y (pw: shar3str3am) Full disclosure: development has been AI-assisted/“vibecoded.” I’m actively reviewing/red-teaming/refactoring—and, since last week, running it on a “production” gallery with 25GB/day+ I’d love feedback, feature requests, or security concerns from the Stash community.
The Canary upsets all the right people. Particularly, it seems, in print. The far-right hate peddler known as ‘Tommy Robinson’ has got a bit upset at being called out on a Canary front page for his part in inciting white-supremacist violence in Belfast. And in his annoyance, he gave the Canary some accidental free advertising: He doesn’t have a leg to stand on about the ‘smear’, legally speaking. Truth is an absolute defence and libel requires damage to reputation, while his — and no doubt his income — depends on his supporters seeing him inciting. And even in the UK’s corrupt justice system, there’s no way to say evil like this isn’t inciting: The whole of the United Kingdom is hitting the streets tonight at 7pm following yet another invader attack on our people. It’s time pic.twitter.com/tscckc9ceK — Tommy Robinson (@TRobinsonNewEra) June 9, 2026 And the Canary is not the only outlet to point out that he was not just inciting, but coordinating, the Belfast white hate riots. Like the i: And even far-right ‘msm’ rags have taken him down before, just as brutally: They are far right shithouses. pic.twitter.com/mmrQMALuCy — Andrew (@AndrewEgan89975) June 13, 2026 Of course, Tommeh’s mates might not be too impressed that he was (again) sucking up to foreign billionaires while he was doing it. But then again, they might not care. Only certain kinds of foreigners are despised, perhaps. Tommy Robinson — “Cry harder” And his post didn’t exactly generate much sympathy. Lots of responses encouraged him to get even more upset: Cry harder! You only have yourself to blame! — Duncan Still Socialist tired of LIES & Anger (@BRUMSTOKIE) June 12, 2026 Others focused on the truth of the headline and the article: You mean… the truth?? — Ren (@RenLaz17) June 12, 2026 And quite a few added the ‘patriot’s liking for foreign climes (and cash): You do have ten names though don’t you, protecting British values but changes his name and moves to Spain. The guy that has been an illegal immigrant, complains about illegal immigration. pic.twitter.com/JZIoJFp3LU — My Two Pence (@MyTwoPenceUK) June 12, 2026 Oh fuck I HOPE they did. It’s about time your grifting coked up shit stirring little arse got a proper headline. That’s MARVELLOUS. Well done @TheCanaryUK pic.twitter.com/XdD8W887js — Damian (@D_MQuail) June 12, 2026 Lots pointed out the cash, actually: Where’s the lie exactly you malformed little racist runt? pic.twitter.com/deFGhG0j7s — CaptainBird (@CaptainBird5) June 12, 2026 And the foreigners operating him in return for it: pic.twitter.com/NOrX6TgXi0 — George (@seeyouinpub) June 12, 2026 Some pointed out the, ahem, inconsistency of Robinson’s ‘political’ positions: The whole of the United Kingdom is hitting the streets tonight at 7pm following yet another invader attack on our people. It’s time pic.twitter.com/tscckc9ceK — Tommy Robinson (@TRobinsonNewEra) June 9, 2026 While others just contented themselves with taking the mickey out of him for not realising the obvious: It’s literally there in front of you, you bleeding imbecile — RandomHero (@ImMeHooYou) June 12, 2026 Of the many hundreds of responses, only a few were from people willing to reinforce the idea that he doesn’t incite, or is right to. There are far too many good replies to include them in an article, so if you have a spare few minutes, reading the others will be a rewarding way to spend them. And of course, spare a few to pop out and buy a Canary print edition, Monday to Friday. You can find your nearest stockist here. It really is upsetting all the right (wrong) people. Featured image via Luke Dray/Getty Images By Skwawkbox From Canary via This RSS Feed.
Here’s the recording for the nineteenth session of our Substack philosophy class for paid subscribers. We finally finished Ch. 7 of Nozick’s Anarchy, State, and Utopia. We’ll be reading the first two chunks of Ch. 8 (“Equality” and “Equality of Opportunity”) for Tuesday. Also, remember that this and all the previous class recordings so far can be found here. Read more From Philosophy for the People w/Ben Burgis via This RSS Feed.
🔗 Caption: “Now remember, Cory, show us that you can take good care of these little fellows and maybe next year we’ll get you that puppy.” Alt text: Vinci Bros. Cockroach Farm “Hours of revolting entertainment!” Disqus comments Page couldn’t be archived
“The government is aggressively utilising Te Tiriti to secure elite global market access, while actively dismantling the domestic legal architecture that is required to give the text any real meaning,” writes Nicola Hoobin about NZ trade agreements such as the one signed with India this year. (Photo: RNZ Marika Khabazi) Aotearoa is facing its sharpest constitutional crisis in modern history, as the government professes adherence to Te Tiriti abroad while dismantling it at home, writes international legal practitioner Nicola Hoobin. The coalition government appears to have overlooked a profound legal contradiction as it methodically advances its legislative programme to review, alter, or strip Te Tiriti clauses across 19 separate acts of parliament. While the government is busy dismissing Te Tiriti at home as a flexible, non-binding political instrument that can be unilaterally dismantled by a simple parliamentary majority, it seems to have forgotten that in international trade agreements, it continues to treat the document as a rigid, foundational constitutional pillar. In other words, the government is attempting to maintain an impossible double standard. The smoking gun of this constitutional duplicity sits directly within New Zealand’s premier international trade instruments. These are Article 20.2.1 of the European Union-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement (signed in July 2023) and Article 26.2.1 of the United Kingdom-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement (signed in February 2022). To secure unprecedented market access to the European single market and post-Brexit Britain, the Crown formally executed binding international texts. In doing so, it explicitly, deliberately, and repeatedly assured our global trading partners that: “te Tiriti o Waitangi / the Treaty of Waitangi is a foundational document of constitutional importance to Aotearoa New Zealand.” Far more than empty diplomatic prose, this is an enacted, state-sanctioned admission within international treaties. Under international law, the doctrine of pacta sunt servanda (agreements must be kept) dictates that treaties must be performed in good faith. The Crown can’t, in good faith, represent Te Tiriti to the international community as a permanent document of “constitutional importance” to secure lucrative market access, and then turn around domestically to claim it has a democratic mandate to systematically strip that very same constitutional fabric from our statutory architecture. In public international law, this triggers a principle akin to “estoppel”, which means that a sovereign state can’t blow hot and cold on its foundational legal obligations to suit its immediate economic or political convenience. Te Tiriti in trade agreements The EU and UK agreements represent a radical, modern departure in New Zealand’s trade agreement architecture. In these two agreements, the Crown has shifted from using the Treaty as a passive domestic shield to using it as an active diplomatic marketing asset. Compare the language of “constitutional importance”, for example, with New Zealand’s foundational 1983 Closer Economic Relations agreement with Australia, which contains absolutely no mention of Te Tiriti o Waitangi. By explicitly elevating Te Tiriti to a “foundational document of constitutional importance” in modern texts to secure premium global market access, the executive drew a clear, contemporary line in the sand — one that it can’t now legally or logically erase. Potential for diplomatic friction The legal mechanics of how these international commitments interact with dispute resolution are also revealing. In the UK-NZ FTA, Chapter 26, which relates to Māori trade and economic cooperation, is explicitly carved out from the agreement’s formal, binding state-to-state dispute settlement mechanism. This structural separation means that a failure to cooperate under the terms of the Māori trade chapter can’t trigger formal international trade sanctions or panel arbitrations. By contrast, the EU-NZ FTA approaches compliance through a highly tailored, progressive framework. While the broader interpretation of the Treaty of Waitangi itself remains shielded from standard commercial arbitration panels, the commitments embedded within Chapter 20 (Māori Trade and Economic Cooperation) are subject to specialised bilateral consultation mechanisms. The EU agreement establishes a dedicated institutional dialogue where compliance with the spirit of the Indigenous chapter is under continuous review. This creates an active international forum. If domestic rollbacks undermine Māori economic interests, data sovereignty, or environmental guardianship, it invites direct diplomatic friction and specialised dispute-consultation mechanisms with Brussels. Lest anyone think this international double standard is a relic of previous administrations, the government’s actions in New Delhi show the pattern is alive and well. In signing the landmark New Zealand-India Free Trade Agreement in April this year, the current coalition government exported the Treaty yet again, embedding a dedicated “Cultural, Traditional Knowledge and Economic Cooperation Chapter” that requires all actions to be executed in a “manner consistent with the Treaty of Waitangi”. The Crown continues to play a calculated game. Although, once again, the chapter is safely insulated from formal international dispute penalties, the contradiction it presents to domestic strategy creates a fatal blind spot. In New Zealand public law, courts frequently look to international treaties signed by the executive as extrinsic evidence to interpret the scope of the Crown’s fiduciary obligations. So, for example, if iwi launch judicial reviews against the rollbacks of the 19 targeted statutes — which cover critical resource management, biosecurity, and primary industries — the FTA texts become powerful legal levers. The Crown cannot easily look a High Court judge in the eye and argue that statutory Treaty obligations are vague, unworkable, or a threat to democratic certainty when the executive branch has formally executed international documents telling the UK and EU the exact opposite. The explicit acknowledgments in the EU and UK agreements effectively block the Crown from downplaying the constitutional status of Te Tiriti in a domestic courtroom. This inescapable double standard shifts the ultimate burden of accountability from global panels directly onto our domestic judiciary. Will the New Zealand courts now hold the Crown strictly accountable for its own international admissions, enforcing the principle that a sovereign government can’t legally define Te Tiriti as a cornerstone of our constitution to the rest of the world while treating it as entirely disposable at home? Indefensible urgency With a general election approaching in November, the government is operating within a rapidly shrinking legislative window. As constitutional conventions require a shift towards a caretaker government framework in the coming months, the use of urgency motions to fast-track these 19 statutory rollbacks becomes increasingly indefensible. The international community is watching. If the Crown continues to treat its constitutional partnership with Māori as a disposable asset at home, it risks compromising New Zealand’s standing as a trustworthy partner in global trade, diplomacy, and international law. Nicola Hoobin is an international lawyer specialising in public and private international law, cross-border wealth, international rights, and the protection of art and cultural heritage. She has offices in Auckland and Melbourne, and holds a Bachelor of Laws from the University of Auckland, a Master of International Laws (LLM) from the Australian National University, and postgraduate qualifications in the Laws of the European Union from the European University Institute in Florence, Italy. E-Tangata, 2026 The post Te Tiriti duplicity: honoured abroad but dismissed at home appeared first on E-Tangata. From E-Tangata via This RSS Feed.
Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.
No worries, Germany conceding to Curaçao is their 9th international humiliation. Legendary goal by Curaçao
Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.
Did not realize that lol. I’m good with this then
too based for earth, too cringe for heaven, misfit in hell i mean, huh?
I don’t know the verse you’re referring to. Of course I’m not a Christian either, technically speaking. And Jesus said “if you think Malachai has too much, go on and take a little. He won’t miss it”
The offical Lemmy profile for Goldmaster
Good morning, fellow sobernauts, IWNDWYT, 😁! We may be anonymous strangers on the internet, but we have one thing in common. We may be a world apart, but we’re here together! Welcome to the 24 hour pledge! I’m pledging myself to not drinking today, and invite you to do the same. Maybe you’re new to c/stop drinking and have a hard time deciding what to do next. Maybe you’re like me and feel you need a daily commitment or maybe you’ve been sober for a long time and want to inspire others. It doesn’t matter if you’re still hung over from a three day bender or been sober for years, if you just woke up or have already completed a sober day. For the next 24 hours, let’s not drink alcohol!
For real thats the first thought i had too! Men gonna mansplain 🙄
Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.
still going on that punch build elden ring run. made it to the capital, went through under around all over that MF, found the star fists (goodbye spiked caestus!), found the nomads, beat the shit out of Morgott & Mogh (capital version), god i love this fucking game
Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.
the evidence behind why humans are carnivorous beings. I address this from a Biological, Anatomical, Evolutionary, Anthropological, and Metabolic/Biochemical point of view for an overall picture behind why our optimal way of eating is fatty meat, in absence of everything else, including salad. I hope you enjoy it! ::: spoiler summerizer Thesis and definitions Carnivore status is defined by the diet that gives an animal optimal nutrition, not by survival on small amounts of plants. Humans need nutrients found in meat, while no plant or fungal food is necessary when meat is eaten exclusively. RDAs come from mixed-diet conditions, so nutrient needs can change when the diet is exclusively meat. Chronic disease comes from species-inappropriate food: too many plants, not enough animal protein and fat. Biological and anatomical evidence Zoo animals, dogs, and cats get obesity, diabetes, cancer, autoimmune disease, and arthritis when fed foods unlike their wild diets. Human teeth, jaws, brains, stomach acidity, fat-digestion organs, appendix, and colon all point toward animal-based adaptation. Human stomach pH sits near scavenging carnivores, which fits meat with high bacterial load and meat preserved without refrigeration. Five organs work together to digest and absorb fat, which makes animal fat central to human nutrition. Humans cannot break down fiber like herbivores; the appendix is a vestigial cecum, not a fermentation chamber. Fiber, bowel disease, and IBD Fiber is waste material, blocks nutrient absorption, irritates the gut lining, increases mucus and inflammation, and overworks the colon. Diverticulosis tracks with higher fiber intake and more bowel movements, while constipation, fat, and meat do not track with it. Surgeons use low-residue diets after bowel injury because bowel rest helps recovery. Red-meat-and-water diets, elemental diets, and carbohydrate restriction fit the same bowel-rest model for Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Salisbury, Voegtlin, elemental-diet trials, and fasting-mimicking-diet work support removal of irritating plant material from IBD patients. Evolution, tools, and isotope evidence Humans split from other primates, ate more meat, became taller, grew bigger brains, reduced teeth and jaws, and developed tools and tactics. Early pound stones and later worked tools were used to open skulls, access brains, kill animals, and dismember carcasses. Ice-age conditions pushed surviving ancestors toward animal nutrition because plants and plant-eating animals disappeared under ice sheets. Stable isotope work places early humans, Homo sapiens, and Neanderthals high on the food chain, often above other predators. The Tel Aviv work by Miki Ben-Dor puts humans as hypercarnivorous apex predators across at least 2 million years. Agriculture, skulls, teeth, height, and brain size Ancient Egyptian isotope work and mummy pathology fit a grain-heavy agricultural population with atherosclerosis and visible poor health. After agriculture, skulls, jaws, teeth, height, and brain size worsened because nutrition shifted away from animal foods. Crooked teeth and small jaws come from inadequate nutrition and oral development conditions, not rapid evolution. Pre-agricultural people had wider jaws, straight teeth, wisdom teeth, taller bodies, and larger brains. Brain size rose with meat and fat intake, then dropped when agriculture and plant foods became widespread. Carnivorous human populations Native American buffalo hunters used mass kills, drying, and pemmican to feed communities for long periods. Tall Native American groups, Mongol horse cultures, Inuit groups, Maasai, and Australian Aboriginal hunters are used as human carnivore examples. Mongol armies relied on horse meat, blood, and milk products, traveled without frequent meals, and built a vast land empire without grain agriculture. Inuit accounts include meat eating even during seasonal thaws, with little interest in sour berries. Maasai and Australian Aboriginal groups are tall, lean, muscular, and healthy before Western foods displaced animal foods. Herodotus’ Ethiopian account and Salisbury’s Native American account are used as examples of meat-eating populations linked with long active lives. Metabolic model Fasted metabolism is the normal metabolic mode, and carbohydrate eating interrupts it through insulin. Insulin blocks lipolysis, proteolysis, ketone production, and leptin signaling, so the brain receives a false starvation signal. Carbohydrate-containing diets lower daily energy expenditure by about 300 kilocalories compared with the same calories without carbohydrates. Glucose and fructose damage tissues through glycation, and chronic high blood sugar drives diabetic damage. Ketogenic diets have long been used for diabetes by removing sugar, carbohydrate, and alcohol inputs. Cancer and mitochondrial metabolism Warburg’s cancer model centers on damaged mitochondria, impaired oxidative phosphorylation, glucose dependence, fermentation, and lactate production. Seyfried’s metabolic cancer model builds on Warburg and links cancer control to mitochondrial function and glucose restriction. Ketosis reduces glucose availability to cancer cells and improves mitochondrial respiration, abundance, and resilience in non-cancer cells. Paleomedicina and Cedars-Sinai are used as examples of clinical interest in ketogenic or carnivore-style metabolic therapy for cancer and chronic disease. Plant defenses and natural pesticides Plants cannot run or fight, so they use chemical defenses against insects, animals, and humans. The University of Washington cancer-biology story centers on plant carcinogens and the idea that vegetables contain many natural toxins. Bruce Ames’ work compares naturally occurring plant pesticides with synthetic pesticide residues and finds the natural chemicals far more abundant. Edible plants are handled as less acutely poisonous than hemlock, not as harmless food. Cassava, almonds, cyanogenic plants, peach pits, phytoestrogens, soy, nightshades, gluten, and lectins are used as toxin examples. Hormones, nutrient blockers, photosensitivity, and lectins Soy phytoestrogens are compared with estrogen amounts in women, birth-control pills, and growth-hormone beef. Carbohydrate-driven insulin disrupts leptin and the conversion of testosterone to estrogen, which is tied to PCOS. Fiber, soy, wheat, gluten, and protease inhibitors reduce digestion and absorption of protein and other nutrients. Lime oils and celery compounds are used as examples of plant chemicals that create photosensitivity and sun-related skin injury. Lectins can cross a damaged gut barrier, trigger antibodies, and create molecular mimicry that drives autoimmune disease. Removal of lectins and other plant compounds through a red-meat-and-water carnivore diet is given as reversing Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and Hashimoto’s. Final conclusion Humans are obligate carnivores with one optimal diet: meat. Variation by sex, pregnancy, childhood, or individual preference does not change the species-specific diet. Biology, anatomy, evolution, anthropology, metabolism, plant chemistry, and disease reversal all point to meat as the optimal human food. Plants use defense chemicals because survival in nature is kill or be killed, and human health improves when those chemicals are removed. References [00:14] A High-Fiber Diet Does Not Protect Against Asymptomatic Diverticulosis — https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2011.10.035 [00:18] The Relation of Alimentation and Disease — https://collections.nlm.nih.gov/catalog/nlm:nlmuid-62210780R-bk [00:18] The Stone Age Diet: Based on In-depth Studies of Human Ecology and the Diet of Man — https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Stone_Age_Diet.html?id=UORsAAAAMAAJ [00:19] A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Elemental Diet and Steroid Treatment in Crohn’s Disease — https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.t01-1-00192.x [00:20] Fasting-Mimicking Diet Modulates Microbiota and Promotes Intestinal Regeneration to Reduce Inflammatory Bowel Disease Pathology — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.02.019 [00:25] 3.3-Million-Year-Old Stone Tools from Lomekwi 3, West Turkana, Kenya — https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14464 [00:26] Eat Like a Human: Nourishing Foods and Ancient Ways of Cooking to Revolutionize Your Health — https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/dr-bill-schindler/eat-like-a-human/9780316249508/ [00:29] Diet of Ancient Egyptians Inferred from Stable Isotope Systematics — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.03.005 [00:30] Atherosclerosis in Ancient Egyptian Mummies: The Horus Study — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.02.002 [00:32] The Evolution of the Human Trophic Level During the Pleistocene — https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24247 [00:52] The Histories, Book 3.23 — https://lexundria.com/hdt/3.23/mcly [01:02] Cancer as a Metabolic Disease: On the Origin, Management, and Prevention of Cancer — https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118310311 [01:06] Diet2Treat: Ketogenic Therapy in Newly Diagnosed GBM — https://clinicaltrials.cedars-sinai.edu/view/IIT2022-06-HU-DIET2TREAT [01:08] Dietary Pesticides (99.99% All Natural) — https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.19.7777 [01:24] The Plant Paradox — https://www.harpercollins.ca/9780062427137/the-plant-paradox/ [01:24] Modulation of Immune Function by Dietary Lectins in Rheumatoid Arthritis — https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114500000271 :::
What else was their success in these endeavors reliant on? Why is it insulting to look at the material conditions of the people and see the correlation? A bunch of proud and devout religious people overcame adversity through their faith. They didn’t overcome anything through faith, they made actual efforts and sacrifices against imperialism. The success of a revolution does not require belief in religion. A large part of the Black liberation movement came out of Christianity that was forced on Black people via their subjugation by Europeans, should they be embarrassed of that or is it just the circumstances they found themselves in while still attempting to better their circumstances? Christianity has been a consistently reactionary force in America for its entire history. Nearly all the racists and homophobes in the US call themselves Christian. Some civil rights leaders being Christian does not mean Christianity was a positive force in black liberation. I don’t understand why a communist should be embarrassed of having a clear and accurate analysis of any given situation. Islam is obviously an intrinsic part of Iran, which is why the leadership hasn’t become like most of the nations around them and succumbed to Israel and US influence. Syria is run by self proclaimed Muslims but they obviously don’t actually prioritize their religion because they are actually pawns of Israel and the US. Saudia Arabia is run by self proclaimed Muslims but they worship money, not Allah, so they are not beholden to the demands of Islam. If Iranian leadership acted like this, there would be a second Islamic revolution in Iran that would put devout Muslims in charge again, because that is the priority of the masses as devout Muslims themselves. What is this nonsense? American allies don’t count as Muslim but Iran does? Iranians would overthrow an unjust Islamic government but Saudis and Syrians apparently cannot? Does religion just not exist when it isn’t anti-imperialist?
Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.