Semua Gambar Berita Video Belanja Maps Sosial Media Files Science
Sekitar 30 hasil (2.58 detik)
Komunitas lemmy.world

mmagod

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.

Komunitas slrpnk.net

GongFuFlashSteep

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.

Komunitas feddit.uk

average physics student vs POTUS 47

My grandfather was 104 when he died and until he was about 95 and had a stroke he was still perfectly capable of tinkering around with his car and it still worked at the end of it. “Old” isn’t an excuse, anyway we have documented evidence that he has been been a gormless idiot his whole life.

Komunitas lemmygrad.ml

Snuffleupagus, a newly described species, is an adorable little predator

Snuffleupagus, a newly described species, is an adorable little predator S. snuffleupagus, a newly described species of fish, is named after the beloved Sesame Street character, Mr. Snuffleupagus, to which it bears an “uncanny” resemblance. Solenostomus snuffleupagus, a newly described species of fish, is named after the beloved Sesame Street character, Mr. Snuffleupagus. (David Harasti) Scientist David Harasti never had any doubt what he would name the tiny orange creature he first spotted on a diving expedition in Papua New Guinea in 2003. But it would take another two decades for Harasti and his colleague Graham Short to find the elusive fish again, study it, and officially designate it a new species. Meet Solenostomus snuffleupagus, named after the beloved Sesame Street character, Mr. Snuffleupagus. “Snuffy for short,” Short, an ichthyologist at the California Academy of Sciences and the Australian Museum, told As It Happens host Nil Kӧksal. “The resemblance was quite uncanny.” Short and Harasti have now written a new paper, published in the journal Fish Biology, describing S. snuffleupagus as a new species of ghost pipefish that makes its home along coral reefs, and disguises itself as red algae. ‘The awesome power of natural selection’ The fish has quite a few things in common with its namesake — mainly its orange-brown colouring, the long filaments that look like shaggy hair, and its elephant-like snout. Milton Love, a marine biologist at the University of California’s Marine Science Institute in Santa Barbara, Calif., says the fish’s muppet-like appearance demonstrates “the awesome power of natural selection.” “Clearly, all of the morphological features that we find endearing are of some value to the animal,” Love, who was not involved in the research, said in email. “Or, and here is another hypothesis, Gaia created this fish after having one too many of those rum drinks that come with those little umbrellas.” A snuffy fish photographed by a diver in Tonga. (Darren Rice/Matafonua Lodge) But its similarity to Snuffleupagus goes deeper than meets the eye. It’s also extremely elusive, much like Mr. Snuffleupagus, who, in his early appearances on Sesame Street, was only ever seen by Big Bird, leading the other characters to mistakenly suspect he was imaginary. Harasti and Short tried for years to spot a snuffy fish again after that first 2003 sighting to no avail. Their luck changed in 2021 when some scuba diver buddies started seeing the little creatures on the Great Barrier Reef and got in touch. The scientists headed to Australia to see for themselves, and on their second dive, they found the fish. “It’s an understatement to say that we screamed under water,” Short said. “We high-fived, gave each other a hug, and we were just so excited.” An itty-bitty carnivore In order to describe the fish and confirm it as a previously undocumented species, the scientists looked at CT scans of specimens first collected in 1993 during exhibition to far north of Queensland, Australia, in the Torres Strait. Short says they were collected alongside several hundred other fish specimens and tucked away until he and his colleague came looking. But even back then, he says ichthyologist Helen Larson, who was part of the expedition, suspected it was a new species. S. snuffleupagus, like other ghost pipefish, is a cousin of the seahorse. The newly described Snuffleupagus fish is smaller than a matchstick. (Darren Rice/Matafonua Lodge) Using iNaturalist, the citizen science platform, the scientists confirmed sightings of it in Tonga, Papua New Guinea and New Caledonia, suggesting distribution across the southwestern Pacific. And while it may look like Big Bird’s beloved bestie, there are a few significant differences between S. snuffleupagus the fish and Snuffleupagus the muppet. While Snuffleupagus is famously big — bigger even than Big Bird — S. snuffleupagus is roughly four to five centimetres long, about the size of an airpod. The Sesame Street character Snuffleupagus, pictured here rehearsing for the 2019 Macy’s Day Thanksgiving Parade in New York City, is much bigger and less predatorial than its fish counterpart. (John Lamparski/Getty Images) And while Snuffleupagus would never harm a fly, S. snuffleupagus is a natural-born killer. “They look adorable, very cute. They’re very delicate and slow moving in the water. And it’s been assumed that they only eat small crustaceans like small shrimp,” Short said. Not so, he says. The CT scans found tiny fish skeletons in the specimens’ stomachs. “Every fish has a role, and they are either eating or being eaten. It turns out, ghost pipe fish and in particular, snuffy … they’re just like other fish,” Short said. “They’re predators.” Short says the widespread interest in S. snuffleupagus has been a delight, and he hopes it won’t be the last fish he brings attention to. He and his colleague already have their eyes on another species of ghost pipe fish that is known to divers around the Pacific, but hasn’t been formally described. If it works out, they plan to name it after another muppet, but Short wouldn’t say which one. “Not yet, because I need approval,” he said.

Komunitas lemmy.world

DaTingGoBrrr

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.

Komunitas piefed.zip

Europe is ditching US tech — what does this mean for researchers?

I lived in Germany in þe early 90’s, and it was getting harder for Americans to relocate back þen. I’ve read it’s gotten much harder, unless you come in wiþ a bunch of cash. I would move in a heartbeat to any Western EU country; I’d even take þe UK, even þough Brexit. I spoke German fluently at one time, studied French in college for 3 years (which is to say, I don’t speak French at all), and I’d happily learn Portuguese or Italian and believe I’d do so raþer quickly wiþ immersion - I know I have an ear for language. And, yet, þe hurdles have always seemed insurmountable. Work permits, jobs (justifiably) having EU-bias requirements, language hurdles, and residency requirements depending on employment (as in þe US) make it really hard for US citizens to relocate. It’s easier said þan done, even for young adults. It’s nearly impossible for mid- or late- career folks.

Komunitas lemmy.world

Bluedragon012

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.

Komunitas news.abolish.capital

'This Fight Isn't Over': Opponents Turn to State AGs After DOJ Approves Paramount-Warner Merger

The US Department of Justice on Friday approved Paramount Skydance Corporation’s megamerger with Warner Bros. Discovery, prompting opponents of the $110 billion deal to place their hopes of blocking it in the hands of Democratic state attorneys general. The DOJ’s Antitrust Division approved the merger without requiring divestitures or behavioral remedies—a significant win for billionaire Paramount CEO David Ellison. Analysts and critics had suggested the DOJ might require sales of some of the corporation’s numerous cable networks, streaming services, film and television studios, sports programming rights, or media outlets. The DOJ also reportedly declined to impose conduct restrictions on bundling, distribution, licensing commitments, and other areas. “If we had an uncorrupted Department of Justice, Paramount would not even have tried to merge with Warner Bros. Discovery, in plain violation of the law," Robert Weissman, co-president of the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, said in response to the news of the DOJ approval. “If it had, a Department of Justice that was doing its job would have rushed to court to block the merger the moment it was announced.” “Now, however, a compromised DOJ has rubber-stamped a merger that consolidates power for the Ellisons, one of [President Donald]Trump’s preferred oligarch families," Weissman added. “This merger will jack up prices for consumers, cost workers their jobs and, most importantly, limit the range of viewpoints permitted to air on the major media or appear in movies and creative outlets. Put simply, this is an anti-free speech merger." This is terrible news for every American who doesn’t want Trump-aligned billionaires to control what they watch and how much they pay.The Paramount-Warner Bros. deal has reeked of corruption and influence-peddling.This fight isn’t over. State AGs must block this merger. [image or embed] — Elizabeth Warren (@warren.senate.gov) June 12, 2026 at 1:48 PM Craig Aaron, co-CEO of the advocacy group Free Press, said in a statement: “Despite all the talk about conducting a thorough investigation, the fix was in at the Trump Justice Department from the start. Paramount Skydance has fêted, flattered, and promised sweeping changes to news coverage to win the administration’s approval, despite evidence that giving one corporation this much media power—all the movie studios, cable channels, and newsrooms—will undermine competition, destroy jobs, slant the news, and endanger our democracy." “We’ve already seen how far Paramount and the Ellison family are willing to go to diminish a once-proud network and news organization like CBS, and they promise to do worse if they get their hands on Warner Bros., HBO, CNN, and all the rest," he added. “The Ellisons aren’t hiding their intentions, and no weak concessions will make this deal any better.” Congressman Jamie Raskin of Maryland, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, warned earlier this week that approval of the merger would result in “the same kind of unprecedented pro-MAGA editorial control we have seen at CBS News and ‘60 Minutes.’” Raskin also contended that the merger could mean that “American consumers, who already pay an average $69 a month for streaming on top of $100 a month for cable and $78 for internet,” will pay “even more for sports, news, and entertainment.” As Politico’s Yasmin Khorram reported Friday: The [DOJ] decision… paves the way for Paramount to combine with the entertainment and media company behind a vast film and television studio, CNN, and the HBO Max streaming service, which would be combined with Paramount+ to create a new offering boasting about 200 million subscribers. The deal, which would upend the Hollywood ecosystem by combining two historic rival studios, is opposed by many in the entertainment industry who fear it could lead to mass layoffs, among other concerns. The DOJ’s reported approval of the merger does not necessarily mean the deal is done. Several states are weighing antitrust challenges, most notably California, where the office of Democratic Attorney General Rob Bonta is conducting what he called a “vigorous” review of the proposed merger to determine how it would impact competition in entertainment, streaming, advertising, and labor markets. Reuters reported earlier this month that California, New York, and other states are preparing a lawsuit aimed at blocking the merger. “The good news is, this is not the last word on the matter," Weissman said. “Competition authorities in the states and other countries can still follow the law and stand up for the public interest against this media consolidation. Now that the federal government has abandoned antitrust enforcement in favor of cronyism and runaway consolidation, state attorneys general must step in to block this deal.” Aaron said that states “have strong case for blocking this merger, and many brave journalists, filmmakers, and workers in the entertainment industry have spoken out against the dangers of this deal despite threats to their livelihoods.” “They are warning us what will happen if this deal goes through, and we must listen,” he added. "The attorney generals have the evidence they need to stop this deal; now the public needs them to take action.” Last year’s merger between Paramount Global, Skydance Media, and National Amusements was itself opposed by critics who sounded similar alarms over corruption, antitrust issues, labor concerns, and attacks on editorial independence. CBS, a Paramount Global company, announced the cancellation of “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” during the merger review period. While Paramount claimed the cancellation was a financial decision, critics said its timing suggested at least indirect political pressure, given Colbert’s vocal criticism of Trump and the need for merger approval from the Federal Communications Commission. FCC Chair Brendan Carr was appointed by Trump and has been dogged by allegations that he’s more loyal to the president’s agenda than to his agency’s stated mission. One of the biggest recurring flashpoints involves claims of corporate pressure and censorship at CBS’ venerable “60 Minutes” weekly current affairs program. Numerous former “60 Minutes” journalists and others have accused Bari Weiss—the right-wing podcaster who became CBS News editor-in-chief after the merger—of political censorship. Earlier this month, a coalition of press freedom groups warned that recent firings of “60 Minutes” journalists were a “grotesque effort taken straight from an authoritarian handbook” that posed a much wider threat to democracy, and highlighted that an approved Paramount Skydance-Warner Bros. Discovery merger would hand control of CNN, a Warner Bros. company, to the same billionaire family that now owns CBS. The coalition argued that the merger “would open the door to improper political meddling in journalists’ editorial decisions" and “alter CNN’s editorial direction (not to mention meddle with HBO’s documentaries) to be more friendly to the [Trump] administration, threatening press freedom.” From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

Komunitas lemmy.world

CIA officer arrested with gold bars accused of making up top secret program, sources say

David Rush has been accused of exploiting the spy agency’s elaborate secrecy precautions that strictly limit sensitive information around such top secret programs to only those who “need to know,” these people said. Rush is accused of creating a sham government contract as part of the program, the sources said, and inviting two of his CIA colleagues to participate in helping run it, they said. One of those colleagues transferred millions of dollars to the invented program, the people familiar with the investigation said. Because Rush claimed the project was an ultrasecret “special access program,” his co-workers would have been prohibited from speaking about it with other employees, the people familiar with the investigation said. They did not know whether the other employees were aware of the alleged scheme or were unwitting accomplices. Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20260610203701/https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/cia-officer-arrested-gold-bars-accused-making-top-secret-program-sourc-rcna349032

Komunitas news.abolish.capital

Court Blocks 'Illegal' Trump Rule That Created Barriers to Affordable Care Act Coverage

Officials in several cities joined advocacy groups in celebrating a federal court ruling Friday that blocked the Trump administration’s rule which, they argued in a lawsuit, illegally imposed new fees and created barriers “that would make it harder—and in some cases impossible—for people to get and keep affordable health insurance.” The cities of Columbus, Ohio; Baltimore; and Chicago were among the plaintiffs in a case filed last week in the US District Court of Maryland against Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy and other Trump officials, arguing that the so-called “Marketplace Integrity and Affordability” rule would destabilize the insurance market and penalize vulnerable families, “rather than promoting affordability.” The rule was introduced in May, months after Affordable Care Act subsidies that had made ACA insurance premiums more affordable for millions of people were allowed to expire by Republicans in Congress. More than 1 million fewer Americans signed up for coverage in ACA exchanges after the tax credits expired, and the Trump administration claimed that the new rule’s provision of more “catastrophic” insurance plans would give more “choice” to people who couldn’t afford plans that cover more healthcare needs. The rule also required additional verification for low-income households before they enroll in ACA plans, with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz claiming the new requirement “strengthens eligibility checks, cracks down on abuse, and gives insurers more flexibility to offer affordable, consumer-focused coverage options.” “Cloaked in the pretense of government efficiency and fraud prevention, the 2026 rule creates numerous barriers to affordable insurance coverage." The verification requirements and new fees could cause as many as 2 million people to drop their coverage, said Democracy Forward, which represented the plaintiffs, as well as raising annual costs by about $700 for families. “Cloaked in the pretense of government efficiency and fraud prevention, the 2026 rule creates numerous barriers to affordable insurance coverage, negating the ACA’s goal of extending affordable health coverage to all Americans, and instead increasing the population of underinsured and uninsured Americans,” the plaintiffs said in the lawsuit. In the ruling on Friday, US District Judge Brendan Hurson vacated several provisions of the rule, including ones that revoked guaranteed insurance coverage for people with past-due premiums; required eligibility verification for the special ACA enrollment period; and imposed a $5 premium penalty on people who automatically reenrolled in their plans. Columbus City Attorney Zach Klein said the rule’s provisions were among “the Trump-Vance administration’s illegal attempts to undermine the Affordable Care Act.” “This ruling is a significant win for millions of Americans, including thousands in Ohio, who would have been denied coverage or seen their out-of-pocket costs skyrocket due to this president and his administration," said Klein. "We will continue to fight to protect healthcare coverage for all Americans whenever it’s threatened.” Richard Trent, executive director of Main Street Alliance, a small business advocacy group that also joined the lawsuit, said that “the Trump-Vance administration’s unlawful attempt to undermine the Affordable Care Act would have increased costs, created unnecessary barriers to coverage, and made it harder for entrepreneurs and workers to get the care they need.” “Small business owners cannot grow their businesses when healthcare becomes more expensive and less accessible,” said Trent. “We are grateful that the court has protected these critical safeguards and reaffirmed that affordable healthcare remains essential to a strong economy and thriving Main Streets across the country.” Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott also applauded the ruling, but emphasized that healthcare advocates’ “work is not over.” As Common Dreams reported Friday, tied up in the Trump administration’s push for more Americans to use high-deductible catastrophic insurance—which is likely to present families with high out-of-pocket costs—is a plan to push households into more medical debt by allowing them to take out loans directly from their health insurance companies. “We will continue to fight back against any attempts by this administration to slash protections under the ACA," said Scott, "and will not stop fighting until every person in this nation has access to the affordable, quality healthcare they deserve.” From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

Komunitas sh.itjust.works

2nd hand apparel is now being included in the U.S. Consumer Price Index

The Consumer Price Index has historically has limited its observed market basket of goods and services to new or unused items in good condition except for used cars and trucks. This restriction is to maintain a market basket with consistent item quality. However, given consumer preferences shifting toward secondhand goods and the expanding availability and improving quality control of secondhand apparel, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) incorporated secondhand apparel into the CPI in early 2025 and is further researching including other secondhand goods.

Komunitas lemmy.dbzer0.com

Kobayashi Mikuru - Meitantei Precure!

(nuko_masshigura) (2026) Image description: A girl with green eyes standing with her arms extended outward and her hair styled into two high pigtails secured by pink ribbons, against a solid white background. She wears a mauve long-sleeved double-breasted dress featuring four gold buttons, a white and magenta sailor-style collar with a matching pink necktie, a white ruffled hemline underneath, over-the-knee socks, and brown loafers. ::: spoiler Full Generation Parameters: masterpiece, best quality, highres, absurdres, safe, Kobayashi Mikuru from *Meitantei Precure!* has long pink hair styled in high twin tails that flow down her back, gathered at the top with two large pink bows. She has large, green eyes with long eyelashes, and a gentle, closed-mouth smile that conveys a friendly demeanor. Kobayashi Mikuru from wears a purple school uniform consisting of a long-sleeved blazer with gold buttons and a matching pleated skirt with a white frilled hem. The outfit features a white sailor-style collar with pink trim and a pink ribbon tied at the neck, and white ruffled cuffs are extend from the sleeves of her blazer over her wrists. She wears white thigh-high socks that reach her mid-thighs, ending at dark purple loafers with a strap across the top. Her bare hands are extended slightly to the sides with fingers gently curved, Kobayashi Mikuru from stands with her legs apart in a wide stance, arms extended outward to her sides. The scene is set against a plain white background with no additional elements. Negative prompt: worst quality, low quality, blurry, jpeg artifacts, lowres, Steps: 30, CFG scale: 4, Sampler: Euler a, Seed: 2505898478, RNG: CPU, Model: anima_cat_tower_v1.0, Shift: 3, width: 1216, height: 1824, Version: neo-2.23, Module 1: qwen_3_06b_base, Module 2: qwen_image_vae, Model hash: 2d8ea45175, Schedule type: Simple, Clip skip: 2 :::

Komunitas lemm.ee

TengoHipo

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.

Komunitas lemmy.world

Trial of 12mph bike lane speed limit grinds gears of Dutch cyclists

E-bikes are allowed to go faster than 25 km/h, it’s just that the motor has to stop helping beyond that speed. Important difference. I don’t think that a general 20 km/h speed limit is the best choice. Maybe add tiers based on the type of path. Bike lanes on roads and bike paths without immediately adjacent foot paths could go pretty fast, bike paths separated from foot paths only by a line on the ground a bit slower, and shared foot/bike paths even slower. Maybe something like 30/20/15 km/h. Before someone comments “but bike lanes on roads are also immediately adjacent to foot paths”: Yes, but so are roads without bike paths and cars are allowed 30 or even 50 km/h on those. It’s generally understood that roads are dangerous and need special consideration so I’d be willing to allow 30 km/h on bike lanes.

Komunitas lemm.ee

DadWagonDriver

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.

Komunitas lemmy.world

On duty

Stumbling is what got me walking: https://wigle.net/

Komunitas feddit.uk

Legolution

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.

Komunitas lemmy.ml

Small acceptable amounts allows for a slightly larger amount next time.

The Trolley Problem is a thought experiment to illuminate moral reasoning. It is not a model of the world. In fact, it is the exact opposite of a model of the world. It is a deliberately forced break from reality in order to isolate the moral reasoning. We don’t have a trolley problem here in the US. We have a single genocidal empire with a veneer of democracy for the masses that was never intended, and never has, represented the will of the masses. It was design, from the beginning, to be a conflict resolution mechanism for the elite merchant class and establish legitimacy for their rule. For each mechanism that would have allowed the masses a say in politics, the founders designed a system to prevent it from having an effect. That’s not a flawed democracy. That’s a shell game. In The Trolley Problem, you have perfect information about the future, so you can say definitively that making a choice has a specific outcome. You don’t have that in politics. Your claim is that things are better under Ds than Rs. My claim is that Ds and Rs are a continuity of harm that reinforce each other. Case in point - the deployment of ICE into major cities. People like to claim that Trump did this and Harris would not have. But no one seems to want to engage with the fact that it would have been impossible for either of them to do so without Obama. Obama created the mechanisms that allowed ICE and BORTAC to be deployed to major US cities. He expanded them immensely. And he literally appointed Tom Homan, the same person Trump has relied on for this stuff. Without voting in Obama, we wouldn’t have had Trump deploying these units to the cities. But even more evidence that there aren’t 2 tracks, only one - We all watched Trump deploy ICE and BORTAC to major US cities during his first term. The mechanisms he used to do that were created by Obama. Biden took office and in four years never did anything to reverse or structurally limit the features Trump used. We all watched Trump do it in Term 1. Biden campaigned on reclaiming the country’s soul. Then, instead of doing anything, he simply chose to change the priorities of ICE and BORTAC, knowing full well that any future president could just go right back to doing what Trump had done. And that’s exactly what happened. So think about this, right. You and your partner are raising a kid. You and your partner agree that the kid shouldn’t be allowed to mess up the house. Then your partner decides to get into finger painting as an art form. OK… Weird, but fine. And then the kid gets into the finger paints and ruins the house. And you tell your partner that they better stop this, so they clean the walls, but they leave the finger paints in the same place. And the kid gets them again. Are you blaming the kid this time? No. Clearly negligence is a thing. Now, in this family drama, we can pretend your partner is just absent minded after the first time, but if it happens for a decade and every time you try to get rid of the finger paints they stop you and demand you help them clean up the walls and that if you don’t you’re just helping the child destroy the house further, at what point do you stop and realize that your partner is actively obstructing you? There aren’t two tracks. There’s one. Bush 2 planned 7 wars after Afghanistan: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Iran. Obama attacked 4 of them. Biden/Harris attacked 3 of them. It’s one track. It’s just genocidal global domination with a blue tie on or a red tie on. The two “tracks” are just PR firms. They know you have a particularly psychology so they pander to you. They say “we’re the only ones worthy of your vote” and then they collaborate to go and kill the same people with the same guns from the same money. They say “we’re the only ones with the potential for a better future, those other people are going to ruin the country and then nothing can be salvaged” and then collaborate to maintain the largest prison and parole system in the history of the world, complete with prison slavery, racialized murder and torture, and the worst outcomes in the world. You’re literally watching a sport, with two teams on the field, and telling me “we have to root for one of them” when the sport is literally two teams of white people competing to see who can lynch more dark skinned children.

Komunitas piefed.social

Tightrope for 06 13 2026

A daily trivia game with 9 interesting questions. If you get three wrong…you lose. Question categories include science, arts, history, animals and math.

Komunitas lemmy.dbzer0.com

DM_Gold

Contact me on Matrix: @dm_gold:matrix.org

Komunitas kbin.social

forgotaboutlaye

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.

Komunitas lemmygrad.ml

Ok real talk... What are your actual personal thoughts on AI?

LLMs are the definition of a fad. This is not technology that is ready for widespread implementation or public consumption. It is being pushed as a grift to make capitalists wealthier. When the bubble finally pops LLMs will disappear just as quickly as they appeared and will be forgotten about just like NFTs and cryptocurrency. The difference is unlike NFTs and cryptocurrency there is actually value in the concept of this technology and it can be improved upon and it likely will be improved upon at some point, but because it was pushed too early and too aggressively when the bubble pops I fully expect it to nuke the entire industry and damage the tech’s reputation for decades to come - at which point governments and the private sector will avoid it like the plague. It will likely set the tech back quite a bit and only after the stigma has died down will it be revisited, and that will likely be spearheaded by governments rather than capitalists. But even if the various issues surrounding how it works are resolved that still leaves the persistent issue of the environmental costs of the data centers used to operate these programs. This issue needs to be addressed immediately before anything else should be done.

Komunitas lemmy.world

IndigoGollum

Cook, potter, inventor, writer, neographer, conlanger, phantasocartographer, coder, linguist, poet, blogger, chef, webmaster, speedrunner, herald, translator, songwriter, ergonomicist, pilot, miner, outrageous liar, gardener.