Sekitar 30 hasil (1.64 detik)
Komunitas piefed.blahaj.zone

rule crash

I discovered I was nonbinary through a much more roundabout way personally. I had a gender crisis in high school, but I only knew about the full FTM and MTF kinds of trans. So since the idea of being a girl distressed me just as much as the reality of being a guy I figured that I wasn’t trans I just hated “traditional masculinity” until like almost 20 years later when my now wife went “That sounds nonbinary to be tbh” and I had some googling to do. I did however go through a very similar progression to figure out I was Ace albeit without the car crash though. Good old “Straight is the Default Right Guys?” then “Huh … I don’t actually feel any different about men and women, do I? Must be Bi lol” into “Yeah dumbass, you don’t feel any different because you do like both men and women the same amount… fucking 0” to finally “Okay, upon further review you are open to reciprocating affection from basically anybody as long as you are attached to them enough emotionally.”

Komunitas lemmings.world

wallybeavis

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.

Komunitas lemmy.world

All you do is take!

Hell, get a gym membership, work on your body and get on the dating apps. Be serious and straightforward with the women you meet. Show them the kindness and empathy your toxic parents didn’t show you. Maybe you’ll meet the right woman and together you can build a future. There’s no rule that says a six year old can’t start a family

Komunitas feddit.de

Waluigi

Hello Friend.

Komunitas hexbear.net

Podcast Player for Linux Mint?

Oh interesting, I figured because Mint uses cinnamon and it wasn’t in the software manager it wouldn’t be compatible, thanks!

Komunitas lemmy.ml

Flyswat

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.

Komunitas hexbear.net

some people say

New revelations are drawing attention to the growing military relationship between Russia and China. According to reports, Chinese military facilities hosted Russian troops for specialized training in 2025, including courses on radiological, chemical, and biological protection. The report said the program was approved at senior levels within Russia’s defense establishment and involved high-ranking military officers from both countries. China has denied the allegations, calling them “entirely unfounded,” while Russia has dismissed previous reports on the matter. However, European officials say they have independently confirmed that training took place and are assessing its implications. The developments come as Europe increasingly debates China’s role in supporting Russia amid the war in Ukraine. Assuming I take this as true, I guess it’s good in case they deal with US-backed biolabs in Ukraine

Komunitas reddthat.com

WackyTabbacy42069

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.

Komunitas sh.itjust.works

Looks like they didn't vote for her then

The quote is when she got flustered after being asked in person about Israel. She was indeed a little flummoxed and had a hard time getting her words out at her constituent.

Komunitas lemmy.ml

National Nurses United in #USA demands end to the US blockade of fuel entering Cuba

cross-posted from: https://expressional.social/users/Peter_Link/statuses/116846041294566331 National Nurses United in #USA demands end to the US blockade of fuel entering Cuba from #NationalNursesUnited (on FB) #Nurses save lives! That’s why we’re in D.C. demanding the #US end the #blockade of fuel entering #Cuba. This is fuel that powers water pumps and #hospitals that 11 million people depend on. Surgeries postponed. Essential #medicines gone. Infant mortality doubled. Enough! #NoWarOnCuba #USHandsOffCuba #OilForCuba! #CubaIsNotAlone #EndTheBlockadeEmbargo #CubaSolidarity #LetCubaLive #EndSanctionsAgainstCuba #OffTheList #CubaNoEstáSola #VivaCuba #CubaSí #AbajoElBloqueo #SolidaridadConCuba #PetróleoParaCuba #LatinAmerica #Caribbean #news #politics #USpol @cuba

Komunitas discuss.tchncs.de

How to manipulate individual vertices?

Newbie here. FreeCAD is v1.1.1 Is there really no way to do simple manual vertices manipulation? Coming from Wings3D. Found the Fase feature (PartDesign_Chamfer) which is a good start for my usual extrude/bevel workflow but I can not for my life find out how to manually select and move vertexes manually / individually. I learned about converting a part into a mesh but even here I seem to not have the option to move vertices around freely? Do I really have to go down to a 2D drawing first and work from there?

Komunitas lemmy.world

Justice Jackson rips Justice Thomas in scathing birthright citizenship concurrence

Jackson criticized her fellow justice’s “ahistorical” interpretation of the 14th Amendment. Echoing the Trump administration’s sentiments, Thomas argued in his dissent that the 14th Amendment “was designed and understood to secure equal rights for the freed blacks but has instead been repurposed for political projects that the Reconstruction Congress did not support.” Thomas also argued that the Civil Rights Act, which became the foundation for the 14th Amendment, had ensured citizenship to people born in the U.S. and “not subject to any foreign power.” “The Citizenship Clause [of the 14th Amendment], which the same Congress passed shortly after the Civil Rights Act, was understood to have the same meaning,” Thomas wrote. “It guaranteed citizenship to persons who were both ‘born . . . in the United States’ and ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof.’” Jackson called this “ahistorical,” denying that the “text at issue conferred citizenship only on freed Blacks and those in analogous situations.” Jackson also blamed the Trump administration and Thomas for repurposing the amendment, adding that the Civil Rights Act initially only included Black people but was later expanded to include people of all ethnic backgrounds.

Komunitas news.abolish.capital

Woodcock charge deer to defend nests, footage reveals

American woodcock, short, plump shorebirds with long, thin beaks, are widely known for their bobbing stride and nasally “peent” calls, but not for being aggressive. Yet one April afternoon, when a deer sniffed around a woodcock hen’s ground nest looking for food, the hen lunged at it, scaring it away. From Biology News - Evolution, Cell theory, Gene theory, Microbiology, Biotechnology via This RSS Feed.

Komunitas lemmy.ml

In Offering Brazil’s Future to the US, Flávio Bolsonaro Endangers our Sovereignty and Democracy [Donroe Doctrine]

::: spoiler [2026-06-29] BRASILWIRE Not only is “Bolsonaro Jr’s” proposed sell out of Brazil to the Trump administration abhorrent, it is illegal. By Marcelo Zero The “generous offer” made by candidate Flávio Bolsonaro—officially recorded in a letter from Marco Rubio—to provide the current US administration with a “transition team” should he be elected, has caused astonishment and indignation for any Brazilian citizen who holds even the slightest regard for national sovereignty. From a political standpoint, there is no doubt whatsoever that this constitutes an abject and extremely serious display of submission to a foreign power—a clear and direct affront to the country’s independence. What is even more astonishing, however, is the tepid reaction from the mainstream media and conservatives in general to something that should have, at the very least, triggered widespread and fierce protests. To illustrate the point, let us imagine the reverse scenario: suppose that in 2022, the then-candidate Lula had offered his transition team to the Chinese government. What do you think would have happened? I have no doubt there would have been a massive scandal, and that the Bolsonaro administration would have blocked Lula’s candidacy or prevented his inauguration—actions that were attempted anyway. It is essential to consider, first of all, that candidate Flávio promised Marco Rubio something entirely illegal. No Brazilian candidate can promise a foreign power something that is not provided for by law—something that lacks any legal basis. The national law governing the formation of the transition team—Law No. 10.609 of December 20, 2002—reads as follows in its main provision: Art. 1. The candidate elected to the office of President of the Republic is granted the right to establish a transition team, subject to the provisions of this Law. Art. 2. The transition team referred to in Art.1 …aims to gain a full understanding of the operations of the bodies and entities comprising the federal Public Administration and to prepare the acts to be initiated by the new President of the Republic, for issuance immediately following the inauguration. § 1º Members of the transition team shall be appointed by the President-elect and shall have access to information regarding public accounts, as well as federal government programs and projects. Art. 3. Heads of federal Public Administration bodies and entities are required to provide the information requested by the transition team Coordinator, as well as to furnish the technical and administrative support necessary for the team’s work. This is, therefore, a very serious matter. By law, the transition team gathers detailed information on all programs, actions, and figures of the incumbent government—including potentially classified and strategic data—primarily to prepare the major acts and decisions to be adopted immediately after the inauguration. It is a complex process involving great responsibility and sensitive information. For this very reason, Article 5 of the law clearly establishes that—without prejudice to the duties and prohibitions set forth in Law No. 8.112 of December 11, 1990—holders of the positions referred to in Article 4 must maintain the confidentiality of the data and information to which they have access, subject to liability under specific legislation. However, officials of a foreign government are under no obligation to maintain confidentiality regarding sensitive information concerning the Brazilian government or Brazil itself. On the contrary, it is in the interest of foreign intelligence agencies to gain access to such information. Thus, by offering US participation in the transition team, Flávio Bolsonaro provided the CIA, DEA, NSA, and others—free of charge—with sensitive information about Brazil to a foreign power; a power known to have a major strategic interest in applying the “Monroe Doctrine” to our region and our country. The Trump administration wants Brazil as its backyard, as a zone of exclusive influence. This is no exaggeration; it is the official policy on the matter. Now, beyond the obviously and deeply negative geopolitical aspect of the Bolsonaro team’s offer, it seems to us that there are also legal aspects to consider. Indeed, Article 359-K of the Penal Code reads as follows: “Handing over to a foreign government, its agents, or a foreign criminal organization—in violation of legal or regulatory provisions—a document or information classified as secret or top-secret under the law, the disclosure of which could endanger the preservation of the constitutional order or national sovereignty: (Included by Law No. 14.197 of 2021) Penalty – imprisonment for 3 (three) to 12 (twelve) years.” It appears to us that the transition team’s offer to the US necessarily implies an intent to make Brazil’s secret information available to the Washington administration—since, as we demonstrated above, this is what typically occurs within a national transition team. In other words, there is, at the very least, an intention to commit acts defined as crimes under our Penal Code. It is even probable that such crimes have already been committed by the Bolsonaro team during the negotiations held with the US State Department. Another legal aspect to consider is the offense of “assault on sovereignty,” introduced into the Penal Code by Law No. 14.197 of September 1, 2021. Accordingly, Article 359-I of the Code states the following: “Art. 359-I. To negotiate with a foreign government or group, or their agents, for the purpose of provoking acts typical of war against the country or invading it: Penalty – imprisonment for 3 (three) to 8 (eight) years.” Now, Bolsonaro and many of his supporters explicitly and enthusiastically encouraged and backed the classification of our common criminal organizations as “foreign terrorist organizations.” Such a classification allows the US to carry out acts typical of war against countries alleged to harbor these supposed “foreign terrorist organizations.” This is what recently happened (and is still happening) in Venezuela, Colombia, and, to some extent, Mexico. Many vessels belonging to alleged “narco-terrorists” (in reality, mostly fishermen) were bombed, as was the home of an alleged Venezuelan “narco-terrorist.” Venezuela was invaded, its president was abducted, and dozens of people were killed in the process. Eduardo Bolsonaro-already sentenced to over 4 years in prison for lobbying US to interfere in his father’s coup trial-was so enthusiastic that he called for bombings in Rio de Janeiro’s Guanabara Bay. Consequently, anyone who encourages and supports this US classification falls foul of Article 359-I of our Penal Code, given that similar acts of war could occur in Brazil at the whim of the US government, in a completely unilateral manner. All this without even mentioning the “Violent Abolition of the Democratic Rule of Law,” provided for in Article 359-L, which reads: “…attempting, through the use of violence or serious threat, to abolish the Democratic Rule of Law, thereby preventing or restricting the exercise of constitutional powers: Penalty – imprisonment for 4 (four) to 8 (eight) years, in addition to the penalty corresponding to the violence committed.” Trump and Marco Rubio have already made it clear that the US intends to interfere in the Brazilian electoral process and have once again cast doubt on the integrity of our country’s democratic mechanisms, paving the way for the kind of intervention that could result in the practical abolition of democracy in Brazil. And the Bolsonaro campaign, just as in the previous election, fully supports these unspeakable attacks. National sovereignty must be defended; Brazilian democracy must be defended; and the Brazilian electoral process must be defended and preserved. None of this will be possible if Flávio Bolsonaro’s candidacy continues. That is the crux of the matter. Ideally, this great evil should be nipped in the bud. The risk to Brazilian sovereignty and democracy is immense. In any serious country in the world, Flávio Bolsonaro and his ilk would have already been arrested. It is worth noting that in the US, “treason” is the only crime explicitly defined in the Constitution. As established in Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution, treason consists of: levying war against the United States or adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. If he were an American, Flávio Bolsonaro would be heading straight to jail. Being Brazilian, however, he might well win a medal—from the US, or perhaps even from Brazil. Abject subservience to foreign interests has become a virtue in these parts. (US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s letter to Brazilian Presidential Candidate Flávio Bolsonaro, son of jailed coup monger Jair.) :::

Komunitas lemmy.ml

Israel spent £50,000 lobbying Reform

Reform UK’s deputy leader said last week that a parliamentary debate into Israeli influence on British politics was “antisemitic in its very motivation and at its core”. “As such, we should utterly reject it,” argued Richard Tice to a room full of MPs. What he did not tell them, however, was that he had been on a trip to “the Gaza front line” last September funded by the newly-created Reform Friends of Israel, where he concluded that the Gaza famine was a “blatant lie”. They also visited Israel’s police headquarters, which is overseen by far-right national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who is sanctioned by the UK for “repeated incitement of violence against Palestinian civilians”. This trip was funded by the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, according to newly released Israeli government data seen by Declassified and found by Berlin-based journalist Yossi Bartel. The records show that the ministry paid Conexión Israel – a company based in Jerusalem that organises high-level country visits – more than £50,000 to facilitate the delegation. The delegates returned singing Israel’s praises and denouncing British protesters marching against the war in Gaza as antisemitic and “naively propping up a terrorist ideology”.

Komunitas news.abolish.capital

Leaked document shows EU closer to dropping leather from anti-deforestation law

The European Commission is taking further steps to formally exempt the global leather trade from its landmark EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), according to a leaked draft obtained by news outlet Euractiv. The revelation comes just one month after a review of internal documents, first reported by Mongabay, exposed a paradox at the heart of the commission: its own consultants explicitly tied leather to widespread forest destruction, yet commissioners are choosing to ignore the data. In the leaked draft, later reviewed by Mongabay, the commission acknowledged the relatively low compliance cost of including leather, but said “the supply chain considerations and load on the EUDR Information System … justify the proposed removal.” The European Commission did not respond to Mongabay’s questions about the document and its authenticity. The proposal is not yet final. Following a feedback period, concluded on June 1, the formal adoption of the delegated act is expected in “the next weeks,” a European Commission spokesperson told Mongabay, after declining to offer any further comments. After adoption, the usual path includes the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union having two months to object. If they do not object or propose revisions, the changes will be automatically enacted. This means that unless EU lawmakers stage an unexpected, last-minute revolt, the leather industry’s multibillion-dollar pass on deforestation is poised to be finalized, policy analysts say. The decision would come via a delegated act, subject to scrutiny by the European Parliament and Council of the European Union, which have…This article was originally published on Mongabay From Conservation news via This RSS Feed.

Komunitas lemmy.world

Homestead Strike Begins (1892) The Homestead Strike was an industrial lockout and strike which began on this day in 1892, culminating in a battle between the Amalgamated Association of Iron and...

Homestead Strike Begins (1892) Fri Jul 01, 1892 The Homestead Strike was an industrial lockout and strike which began on this day in 1892, culminating in a battle between the Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers and private security forces of the Carnegie Steel Company. Unlike earlier strikes in U.S. history, such as the Great Railroad Strike of 1877, the Homestead Strike was organized and purposeful, a sign of how labor agitation would develop in the modern era. In order to break the union at the Carnegie Steel Factory, Henry Clay Frick locked union workers out of the factory on June 28th. On July 1st, thousands of workers, skilled and non-skilled, went on strike. Frick hired the Pinkerton Agency to guard strikebreakers brought in via barge (the factory was on a river), but strikers patrolled a ten-mile stretch of the river to prevent them from making it to the factory. On July 6th, the Pinkertons attempted to land under cover of darkness around four in the morning, however thousands of striking workers and sympathizers were waiting for them on the riverbank. When the agents tried to land, gunfire erupted, killing four people and injuring twenty-three on both sides. The Pinkertons surrendered, and many were beaten unconscious after leaving the boat. The strike was forcibly put down by state militia, resulting in a defeat for the workers. The Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers collapsed, and its workers returned in August. For his role in breaking the union, anarchists Alexander Berkman and Emma Goldman unsuccessfully attempted to assassinate Henry Clay Frick. Date: 1892-07-01 Learn More: en.wikipedia.org, aflcio.org. Tags: #Labor, #Anarchism. Source: www.apeoplescalendar.org

Komunitas lemmy.world

DigitalWanderer

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.

Komunitas lemmy.world

End of an era?

They have but others have not. GTA will come to PC. GoW Faye likely wont. I’d rather wait and emulate the next spiderman and Wolverine game tbh.

Komunitas lemm.ee

AizawaC47

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.

Komunitas lemmy.ml

When "plant-based" isn't vegan?

Again, this implies nonsense like all pizzas being plant based because the pizza is mostly made of wheat. It effectively makes the label meaningless, just a way to trick people and not actually meaningful information. I could see a lawsuit coming out of it. It’s a misleading label, and they have to know it.

Komunitas lemmy.blahaj.zone

captainjaneway

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.

Komunitas sh.itjust.works

TugOfWarCrimes

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.

Komunitas lemmy.world

Is CLI Dependence a Legit Gripe?

CLI punishes uncertainty (but so does a start button to exit Windows). The CLI has no affordances. -No buttons, no hints, and no “maybe you meant…” to help you along. Typing speed matters more than people admit. Slow typists hate the CLI because every action feels like work, mistakes are punishing, and repetition is exhausting. If typing is taxing physically or cognitively, the CLI becomes a chore instead of a tool. Memory Burden: You must remember everything! As I’m aging, I’m forgetting more and more and it’s not like I wasn’t in the top 5% bracket for intelligence when I was younger. GUIs externalize memory and are seen as convenient. I’m comfortable in CLI now, but will probably not be for long. People who dislike the CLI often don’t enjoy memorizing commands (which is understandable). They don’t retain syntax well or use the CLI often enough for muscle memory to form. If you don’t use it daily, it never stops feeling foreign. I love how I can organize and move files by type from subfolders to a home folder with a single line, but when I haven’t done it in a while; it’s still worth doing over drag and drop, but I still have to put effort into it. CLI makes people feel stupid (“command not found”), unsafe (“rm: are you sure?”), and unwelcome. Even seasoned system administrators can easily make a simple typo that can bring a Linux server to its knees (Linux lacks safeguards.) Linux users who learn CLI tend to express their inferiority complex which is seen as elitism, gatekeeping, and condescension. People may dislike CLI simply for the culture around it. Many tasks aren’t even suited for CLI. No one is doing professional media editing from a terminal emulator. People can get by on Windows without it, while they can’t go without GUI.

Komunitas feddit.online

IckabodKobain

Lihat kiriman asli pada platform media sosial terkait.