Not what I would call good results. https://pagespeed.web.dev/analysis/https-supreox-com-custom-wordpress-development/63wk8ieb3x?form_factor=mobile
Oh, so the results aren’t meant for web apps like Wefwef. Speaking of Google’s ranking, so does it mean when Wefwef needs monetization/ads in the future, the PageSpeed results will impact Wefwef’s ability to promote itself or be monetized, if Google AdSense considers user experience when deciding ad revenue?
For brotli compression, first check if nginx/angie has the correct modules (brotli and brotli_static) (nginx -V). If not, you can install it like so: https://www.getpagespeed.com/server-setup/nginx/brotli-static Then create your brotli bomb by modifying the original author’s fish command: fish zip_bomb.fish | brotli --best > bomb.html.br
Wonderful! Just going to add some remarks / thoughts… we might call this the “Social Coding MVP” and when spinning up an app, it is a “social coding platform”. Ideation --> Idea Management “Idea Management” appears to be a more common domain name. Federation between social coding instances: Consider a solarpunk.community and a vidartists.social instance. Ideas should be spread far and wide, ideally federate between instances. A solarpunk “low-energy video editing” idea is interesting to vidartists, a “solar panel upcycle” idea is not. There may be need for a Topic as a separate concept. It might be an as:Group on the wire. Instances receive all Topics from across the fedi, then admin subscribes to interesting ones. Only Ideas matching Subscribed Topics are tracked / stored in a particular instance. Federation across the broader fediverse: From any federated app, e.g. Mastodon, a fedizen can Follow a Topic and then get all topical Ideas in their timeline. This works somewhat similar to Gup.pe groups app. If I follow “Video Editing” on vidartists, I will also get Ideas in that topic that were created on solarpunk. I don’t know if de-doubling is handled if I subscribe to the topic on multiple instances. Licensing of ideas Different instances may have different ideas on how Ideas and the comments to them are licensed. The license that applies is determined by the instance that the Idea / Comment was created on. If one replies from e.g. Mastodon, then the license of Idea is used. It should be indicated in the Topic Profile. We can create a diagram and derive our own vocabulary extension for our domain. Interesting prior work: There’s an idea ontology specification to be inspired from. Diagram can be simple with just balloons and arrows (taken from this Innovation Domain paper). There’s another, rather complete ontology: Generic Idea and Innovation Management Ontology (Gi2MO) Community Governance I’d split this into two separate parts / concepts: Community + Policies Both of these concepts have way broader applicability than our use case, and we can standardize on their definition. For Community I am advocating for a “Community has no Boundary” paradigm (info is a bit dispersed on the forum). For Policies I found some usable ontologies and commented further on (thread itself is beyond scope). For a minimal Community vocabulary extension that facilitates having arbitrary ‘Roles’ I suggested modeling them as follows: Project Management There is the DOAP Ontology to describe projects (also posted to forgefriends). I guess that the Project Management features here should be mostly informational. Referencing repo’s, tools that may exist anywhere. Insight into any relevant project info. Ensuring that privileges are properly guarded and to the interest of the community as a whole.
Am verificat si comparat feddit.ro cu lemmy.world pe site-ul pagespeed.web.dev, au exact acelasi scor. Deci nu exista o diferenta de viteza a site-ului
mod_pagespeed does